2014: The year free social media marketing gravy train derailed
Social media marketing is effective when powerful copywriting/content is combined with a media buy. They should be seen as working hand-in-handBy Julian Chow 02 Apr, 2014
The year 2014 may be remembered as the year where social media ceased to become a free-to-play platform. Today, the three big social networks – Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn – are all public listed companies with responsibilities to their shareholders to return profits. As a result, we’ve seen an increasing number of advertising tools being rolled out, from Facebook’s sponsored updates to Twitter’s sponsored tweets. At the same time, there has been a much-discussed scaling back of organic reach for brand pages on Facebook, which fell from a previous average of 10 – 15 percent to a speculated 1 – 2 percent today. At the same time, LinkedIn is removing the Products & Services section from company pages and asking brands to use their Showcase Pages product. And finally, in a move that may herald a push for increased advertising in the future, Twitter is adding a “tweet views” counter – anyone want to bet that brands who are seeing tweet views much lower than the number of their followers will buy paid products like sponsored tweets? It’s pretty much a no-brainer there.
Yet, I think it’s important to remember here that social media marketing has always been more effective when powerful copywriting and/or content is combined with a media buy. They should be seen as working hand-in-hand. However, the fact is that social media had been overhyped in its early days as a free tool (aside from time investment) and that has created a long-lasting perception up until today that it should be and remain free. You’ll still see a lot of articles saying that this is what makes social media great for small businesses with tight budgets. But if you take the time to think about it, Mark Zuckerberg, Dick Costolo and Jeff Weiner are running businesses, so why should they be providing their services free of charge? How would they pay their employees if that was the case?
With all the developments, it’s important to reframe our perception of social media as a free tool for brands and also startups to engage with customers. That said, I’m also not advocating that you pay to promote or advertise every single post that you put up – you’d destroy your monthly media budget in a couple of weeks if that were the case! Here are a couple of steps I’ve thought about as to how organisations can adapt to the death of free-to-play:
1) Be selective
As I hinted in the earlier paragraph, choose and cherry pick which content you’d like to promote. While every piece of content is important (I’ll assume that you have a solid content strategy in place already), you’ll notice that some pieces have very clear call-to-actions which can impact the business, while some others are really sustenance measures for engaging followers. I’d recommend boosting content which helps drive revenues, generate leads, drive website traffic or boost your following on the platform, like contests and promotions.
2) Buy engagement, not followers
Building on the point about your following or brand community, if you’re familiar with advertising on Facebook, you’d have noticed that there are two main ways in which you can optimise an ad – maximise engagement or maximise the number of new page likes. In my opinion, it doesn’t make sense to buy followers, based on the math involved – with a 1 – 2 percent engagement rate, you’d have to buy an additional 100 followers in order to get an extra person to engage organically with your brand for every piece of content. I feel that it makes more sense to optimise ads for engagement and gain some additional likes in the process. After all, as mentioned in point one above, optimising for engagement can help drive actions which create business value.
3) Invest in creating good content
Content marketing has been one of the biggest buzzwords this year, but behind the hype is a belief that strong content forms the core of grabbing the attention of the desired target audience in an era where we are being bombarded by content from every side. Whilst social networks have become pay to play, good content allows brands to leverage the network effect, spreading that piece of content for free. But if you think good content automatically guarantees free exposure without needing to pay advertising dollars – how about flipping that thought upside down and imagining how much more exposure you’d get by paying to boost that piece of content?
Also Read: Is your Facebook strategy smart?
On the topic of content creation, I won’t deny that the cost, while not astronomically expensive, is definitely not as cheap as curating content put up by others. That said, there are smart ways to defray the cost of creation. One method which I practice is called COPE – Create Once, Publish Everywhere. If you have a good content idea, sure put it up on social media after creating the asset. But also think about how you can leverage it for other channels – earned media (pitches or bylines to journalists / bloggers), direct mailers, online ads, print ads, and so on.
In summary, while the free social media gravy train is slowly but surely grinding to a halt, this doesn’t mean that we should start abandoning all the platforms and communities that we have built. That said, brands can view this as a wake-up call to take a step back and examine their overall social media strategy. From there, invest time and money accordingly into which brings better value to the business.
The views are of the author and e27 may not necessarily subscribe to them
e27 invites members from Asia’s tech industry and startup community to share their honest opinions and expert knowledge with our readers. If you are interested to share your point of view, please send us an email to writers[at]e27[dot]co
LinkedIn United States of America LinkedIn is a professional networking site that allows its members to create business connections, search for jobs, and find potential clients. Latest funding: Not specified Investors: Not specified