shutterstock_173113388 (1)

It seems to me that corporate innovation is broken.

In fact, while I carry the latest Android smartphone, I’m still old fashioned when it comes to checking and managing my emails: I still use the Blackberry.

Blackberry missed the smartphone wave and it’s clear from its recent product launches that attempts at catching up are failing – just look at the Blackberry tablet, touchscreen phones and passport devices. Recently, the company even launched the ‘classic’ – uh oh!

The big question now is whether Blackberry can still survive and thrive?

The nature of technology is innovate or die. Before pondering this question, let’s clarify the difference between innovation and patents. (I’m bringing this up because it’s very common for business news to discuss patents being granted to a corporation, thus implying that the more patents granted, the more innovative a company is).

Also Read: Echelon 2015: “APAC has an unhealthy obsession with unicorns”

The fact is, it’s the ability to commercialise patents that separates innovative companies from the rest, with Apple being the most successful corporate example today. And it’s what startups are designed to do. So, what should Blackberry do? If I were in charge, what would I do to turn things around?

I’d start with what I know, based around my experiences teaching, mentoring and using the ‘lean startup’ approach. I won’t explain this in detail here, but credit goes to Steve Blank, whose workshops I attended.

A lean startup makes a clear distinction between large or established companies verses startups: It’s the idea of ‘search verses execute’ expertise – startups are searching for a repeatable and scalable business model, while established companies and corporations specialise in executing validated business models.

By definition, startup companies are commercialising innovation. More specifically, they’re commercialising cutting-edge products and services, effectively creating new markets.

But that doesn’t mean corporations can’t use the lean startup approach for their innovation management. If anything, it’s common to see corporate accelerators using some of this approach, which leads me to argue that corporate accelerators could be as successful as the best startup accelerators – if the role of the corporation is well understood in the innovation process.

Corporate accelerators also face some challenges under their current design. They are designed more to outsource innovation (which is a good first step), but can fail to note the importance of changing internal corporate culture towards the innovation process. It means that more work needs doing, when it comes to helping corporations fix their innovation process.

So, what is the role of the corporate in innovation – especially the kind of innovation that startups specialise in?

Coming back to Blackberry, lets review its business model. Blackberry’s business model has clearly been validated. At the most basic level, the company used to make a lot of money thanks to some great technology which solved major pain points for a wide customer base.

We can still say the following about Blackberry:

1. Its sales and marketing channels are still strong – we still hear about Blackberry

2. It can manufacture and distribute at a global scale

3. Both consumers and corporations know the brand well

Also Read: Echelon 2015: What’s next for mobile-first Asia?

The conclusion here is that Blackberry specialises in execution, which is why we still hear about it and can still access its products. But it is making products no one wants! It is no longer solving major pain points. Instead, it is executing well from a misguided playbook. Effectively, it is out of touch with customer needs.

Startups approach innovation from the opposite end, designing a solution around solving a problem (validation) and once it’s validated, they scale up. Startups need help in the validation and scale phase of their lifecycle, essentially, testing their solutions and then scaling. Logically, this is the value proposition for corporate accelerators working with startups.

Also, while the whole world is now talking about the Internet of Things (IoT), Blackberry was one of the first technology companies to succeed in that space, way before it became a buzzword.

What can Blackberry do?

I would propose Blackberry set up an accelerator division that plays to its strengths. A simplistic description of the process is that it deliberately runs as many ideas as possible through the accelerator and evaluates them for their successes and failures, by:

– Selecting ideas internally and externally

– Rapidly prototyping and vigorously testing ideas with different customer segments

– Launching the successful products, getting feedback and improving

A critical part of the innovation process is defining what success means. One version is creating a successful product, however, this process will create a lot of failures, so part of the success measurement will ideally include designing for failure. Why? All startups and serial entrepreneurs can tell you that the most important learning process is through failure. There is no major learning in immediately succeeding!

This process would give Blackberry access to a new learning curve and reignite a culture of innovation. The best tech companies are doing this by design.

Also Read: Debunking myths in sheep land: Meet the innovators of New Zealand

Another step I would suggest is that Blackberry partner with large customers from different industries and work with them to solve specific problems.

Apple was left for dead many times – Blackberry still has a chance! #nevergiveup

The article was contributed by Deepak Madnani of PaperclipHK.

The post Deepak: ‘Blackberry Blues. Corporate Innovation is Broken.’ first appeared on EntrepreneurHK.

Image Credit: Shutterstock