Weekly Cornerplay: Do you understand Facebook's Slingshot app?
What is Slingshot app for? If it’s just a way to share, I’m not convinced it does that better than what already exists, says Jeffrey YuwonoBy Jeffrey Yuwono 24 Jun, 2014
Facebook’s new iPhone app called Slingshot, which I’ve used intensely since it launched last week, was initially thought of as a Snapchat competitor and the successor to Poke – which I argued could have beaten Snapchat – but it’s actually quite different.
It’s hard to describe Slingshot, and that’s the app’s biggest problem. You don’t know its purpose.
It’s not a messaging app, though superficially it looks like Snapchat. You take a photo and then send it to one or many people. It’s horrible at messaging because in order for the other person to see your photo, they have to “sling” one back to you first. Then for you to see what that person slung – which won’t be in direct response to what you originally sent – you have to sling another one back again. It’s messy. This encourages those who don’t usually share to share, but if all you want to do is communicate, then Slingshot is inefficient compared to Snapchat or WhatsApp.
It’s not a broadcasting tool either. It’s like Instagram in that you can share a photo easily with all your friends (you can “send to all”); but it’s a bad way to broadcast because of the sling-back requirement. If you’re interested in sharing with as many people as possible, Instagram and Facebook are better methods.
When Slingshot works well, it’s like an intimate version of Facebook’s news feed, because only the people who care about you will sling something back in a timely matter. Those who don’t care will wait for something worthwhile to broadcast before slinging back. So theoretically you’ll get a mix of the timely and intimate plus the late and worthwhile.
That’s in theory anyway. Practically, there aren’t enough people using Slingshot so there’s not much to see. People are posting throwaway photos designed to fulfill the sling-back requirement as quickly as possible, and so are low quality.
Because you can only view a photo once, the app feels too lightweight – like there’s not much to do with it. That’s compounded by the fact that if you only periodically share, you can’t use the app in-between because you can’t view anything without posting something first. It’s a difficult app to use habitually.
My prediction: the majority who try Slingshot won’t get it and won’t invest the time to understand it. And because few use it, even fewer will get value out of it.
Facebook can make improvements but the app has a deeper fundamental problem. What is it for? If it’s just a way to share, I’m not convinced it does that better than what already exists.
The author, Jeffrey Yuwono, blogs at the The Cornerplay, a weekly column about the tech and startup scene.
The views expressed here are of the author, and e27 may not necessarily subscribe to them
e27 invites members from Asia’s tech industry and startup community to share their honest opinions and expert knowledge with our readers. If you are interested to share your point of view, please send us an email to writers[at]e27[dot]co
WhatsApp United States of America WhatsApp is a proprietary, cross-platform, free instant messaging subscription service for smartphones. Latest funding: Not specified Investors: Not specified
Facebook United States of America Facebook is an online social networking service that enables its users to connect with friends and family as well as make new connections. Latest funding: Not specified Investors: Not specified
Snapchat United States of America Snapchat is instantly fun and insanely playful. Show your friends how clever you can be and enjoy the lightness of being! Latest funding: Not specified Investors: Not specified